1368-1369
SNOW-FATHER |
After him,
Snow-Father was chief,
he of the big teeth.
Sagimawtenk gunokeni, sagimawtenk mangipitak.
SHOULD BE
SNOW KIN
WERE LIKE GOD FOLKS.
_ _ _ _ _ _
Sagima (Judge)
wtenk (after)
guno keni
guhn ken
Snow ken
wtenk (then)
mangipitak
man gi pi tak
MANN I TTO WOCK
God folk
MAKV7043
_______________
SHOULD BE
SNOW KIN
WERE LIKE GOD FOLKS.
_ _ _ _ _ _
Sagima (Judge)
wtenk (after)
guno keni
guhn ken
Snow ken
GUHV6030 (TBD)
So, once again, Sherwin's Norse words collected in 1940-50 agree with the words of the LENAPE history, spoken verbally about 1400 and recorded about 1831 by German speaking missionaries.
The word "Ken," which is the English "kin" implies that there were one or more "ken," from the snow country, maybe Greenland, but no priest or "Father."
The word "Ken," which is the English "kin" implies that there were one or more "ken," from the snow country, maybe Greenland, but no priest or "Father."
The fact that Sherwin's words are Old Norse and both documents mean the same thing is evidence that the Americans were speaking Norse when the English invaded.
____________________
Sagima (Judge)wtenk (then)
mangipitak
man gi pi tak
MANN I TTO WOCK
God folk
MAKV7043
_______________
Mangipitak appears to be sounds that were written down incorrectly. The "gi" for "i" is understandable. "P" and "tt" are often exchanged. The final "k" often means "folks."
In this case the inorrect spelling of the sounds appears to have masked the meaning of the word.
If the original sounds had been "Mannitowock" then we might assume the "Father" word in the previous phrase might have meant meant for the SNOW KEN who were like GOD FOLKS.
Notice the pictograph sketch of what might be the ice pack on Greenland.
Notice the pictograph sketch of what might be the ice pack on Greenland.
We have no other historical record of people from Greenland going to America about AD 1369. The effects of the Little Ice Age were becoming more severe. Communications between America and the east side of the Atlantic were effectively stopped.
Also the English may have deliberately suppressed any known communication.
Also the English may have deliberately suppressed any known communication.
But we have learned a few things.
1. The original translators missed the apparent doubling of years onto one stick.
2. The original translators appear to have made errors in translation. I.e. "mo blood" may have meant "not telling."
"Mangipitak" may have been "MANNITTOWOCK." People from the North who are ken but behave like Gods makes a better message to save than a chief with big teeth.
"Mangipitak" may have been "MANNITTOWOCK." People from the North who are ken but behave like Gods makes a better message to save than a chief with big teeth.
3. Decipherment takes much longer than I have allowed.
The best course of action is for me to revise the "second semestor" schedule.
I will post pictographes and stanzas, when I am comfortable with the translations. I am using only words from the VIKING and the RED MAN. If I cannot find a resonable word in the VIKING and the RED MAN, I do not use or publish a translated phrase.
I will post pictographes and stanzas, when I am comfortable with the translations. I am using only words from the VIKING and the RED MAN. If I cannot find a resonable word in the VIKING and the RED MAN, I do not use or publish a translated phrase.
Based on past experience, I will be able to do about one Stansza per week.
Our progress will be slower but our understanding may be better.
Our progress will be slower but our understanding may be better.
No comments:
Post a Comment