Popular Posts



Sandstone Relic
Found By Kevin Callaghan
September, 2006
On Lake Huron







The Catholic Church came to Anerica in 1125
In The Red Score: The Baffin Island Crucible, Patrica Sutherland wrote,
"The purported evidence includes a mix of clear misattribution such as the colonial-period Newport Tower, obvious forgeries of which the Kensington Stone is the prime example, and a wide array of simple frauds and naive misidentifications (Linderoth Wallace and Fitzhugh 2000; Wahlgren 1986).
As a result, the archaeological community has become wary of claims relating
to precolumbian European activity in the New World and responds vigorously in questioning such assertions.
This stance has been a justifiable reaction to patently false evidence in areas that are geographically distant from the known Norse sphere of activities."
Sutherland's statement is unfortunate.  The Newport Tower was meticulously researched by Holand, who published
"Explorations in America before Columbus in 1958.
Holand presented evidence that would convince most juries that the Newport Tower was a keep of a 14th century Norwegian Church.
Suthernland apparently did not read "Explorations in Americs Before Columbus."  If she had read Holand's book, she might have agreed that both the Newport Tower and the Kensington Rune stone were authentic Norse artifacts.
. Sutherland also wrote, "patently false evidence in areas that are geographically distant from the known Norse sphere of activities."
. She did not have a paradiggm that 16 men could row a boat, or paddle a canoe, into the Mississippi River Basin.  
There are three major and several minor rune   stones through out the Mississippi River Basin.  ALL of them appear to be authentic.  The runes can be interrupted and the messages they convey are consistant with the time and place.  So Sutherland's statement ("patently false evidence in areas that are geographically distant from the known Norse sphere of activities.") appears to be "patently false" testimony.

No wonder.  She gives as reference "Wallace and Fitzhugh 2000; Wahlgren 1986.
. These guys work for the "other side."  The people in the "other side" believe the 17th century English NEW WORLD MYTH.
They do not know why they think evidence of Norse in America is patently false evidence but they DO KNOW that any Norse artifact MUST be labeled a fraud somehow.
If Norse arifacts are not frauds, then the NEW WORLD MYTH must be BOGUS.
. I compared all the artifacts labeled a "fraud" by Wallace and Fitzhugh 2000; Wahlgren 1986
against the original evidence and testamony.
I was left with a question:  Why was EVERY artifact declared a "fraud," when I, an Engineer, who knows how to calculate time and distance, was concluding that most of the artifacts were authentic?
Was there a flaw in my paradigm or was something sinister happening in the pages of 2ooo.
Why would the authors and publishers of the book 2000 use nearly two thirds of the pages to describe how the many Norse artifacts were a "fraud"?
That was the beginning of my "other guys" paradigm.
. I respect Patrica very much.  I am distressed that she was suckered into spreading the "other guys" NEW WORLD MYTH.  I hope someone can explain to her, and us on this BLOG, that the SMITHONIAN works for the other side.  Every thing they say or write must be checked against evidence and previous testamony.

When I checked I found more than 5oo artifacts that were NOT
patently false evidence.

I stopped counting years ago but my guess is the the "Other Guys" have labled over a thousand Norse artifacts as "frauds."  Frauds do not get taught professors in schools.  Thus Early American History is profoundly distorted because the evidence has been suppress by omitting it from school curriculums.

The fact that the invaders in the 17th century could stumble on an effective propaganda scheme that could make the Catholics, who spoke Norse be suppressed for four centuries, boggles my mind.

Even more mind-boggling is the evidence that those "other guys" could so profoundly distort  history that they brain-washed a respected researcher like Patrica to spread their NEW WORLD MYTH.

The situation is daunting.  As you read this, professors in 4,500 North American Universities are teaching their students to defend the Other Guy's NEW WORLD MYTH.



Original pictographs & English translation of Old Norse sounds.
~Formatted for smart phones.
\~Norse History of North America from about
 AD 1000 to 1363

  ~Ends with a stanza similar to the one on the
KENSINGTON rune stonewhich is now thought to be genuine.

If the Rune Stone is genuine, the LENAPE HISTORY should be also.

See Appalachian
Shawnee Tribe

An 18 week semester course of the 38 stanzas grouped into 18 episodes.

   ~Each episode should be assigned as homework in conjunction with a weekly assignment in an existing Early American History Course.
     ~Allot 30 minutes per
        week for discussion.
~The episodes include:
.     ~The Norse settling of
         North America, 
 .      ~The Catholic religion 
           comes to America.
           to become the
            SHAWNEE (southern
             Lenape) and the
             LENAPE (Greenland)
    .       ~The LENAPE
The episodes each Include a link to artifacts that are evidence that the English NEW WORLD MYTH is bogus.
Each episode Includes the look up of Old Norse words to teach the viewer the use of the VIKING and the RED MAN  DROPBOX


~Links to contents of LENAPE LAND BLOG
   ~Use the links to go directly to Stanzas.

Links to episodes in North American history before the LENAPE migration in the 14th century.

~Includes the copper hauling era (2200 to 1200 BC)
~Three mIIlion people from the east side of the Atlantic paddled 200,000 boats over the PAN NORTH ATLANTIC waterways to haul away a BILLION pounds of copper from Lake Superior.  
The people on the east side of the ATLANTIC used the stolen copper to create and sustain the BRONZE AGE.

~Includes the historical episodes of the ADEANA Culture and the HOPEWELL culture , which followed the copper hauling era.

~The people of the Adena Culture used Tifinaq symbols in Africa, the Baltic Sea and in North America.

~The HOPEWELL culture had Hebrew script including the decolog, which was found in two regions of North America.
  • The LENAPE EPIC ncludes the Norse settlement in North America, which is called the 
  • MISSISSIPPI culture.

"WYNLAND OF WEST" are words punched into the KENSINGTON rune stone. 
~The words refer to the Norse settlements above FARGO, ND-MOOREHEAD, MN.

~The route of I-94 from MOOREHEAD MN to MINNEAPOLIS MN passes over the waterways that the Norse used to move their boats into the Mississippi Basin.
The professors, who teach the 17th century English NEW WORLD MYTH, have long ignored the accumulation of Norse artifacts along the I-94 route.  Many of artifacts are listed in this Blog.
Paradigm Shift is a blog dedicated to presenting evidence that the Eurocentric NEW WORLD paradigm of North American history is bogus. 

The paradigm in everybody's head should be replaced by a paradigm that includes the evidence of artifacts and the Norse language found in North America.

The LENAPE history ended in 1585, when the Englishman, Ralph Lane shot the LENAPE historian in the head.

~The LENAPE LEARNING posts are LENAPE history, but the topics are arranged in index order.


The LENAPE history is also a Catholic history, which has NOT been taught because the English suppressed the knowledge of Catholics, who spoke Norse by omitting the n.

This post encourages
Catholic professors to teach the LENAPE

An invitation and a preview to the Blue Mountain Lenpe encouraging them to study the LENAPE HISTORY COURSE.

The Blue Mountain Lenape are descentants of the LENAPE, who were Catholics, who spoke Norse.

An invitation and a preview to friends of the  Lenpe encouraging them to study the LENAPE HISTORY COURSE.

The friends of the Lenape learn that the LENAPE, were Catholics, who spoke Norse.

The LENAPE first came to America by paddling their canoes along the waterway that was created by the people from the east side of the Atlantic, who came to haul away copper.
   ~This map features a canoe route from Greenland to the"Island in the sea," which was the Minnesota Horst.
   ~The Minnesota Horst was the best way to move a canoe or a boat from the Christian Sea (a.k.a. Hudson Bay) to the Mississippi basin.
This route gave the Catholics, who spoke Norse access to the Mississipian culture waterways.

The PATAVOMEK tribe is living evidence that when the English invaded, most Americans were Catholics, who spoke Norse.  
   ~Those Catholics called themselves LENAPE, which means to "abide with the pure."



Norse vs NO Norse

Yesterday I edited the Wikipedia, NORUMBEGA. but I could not figure out how to add my source reference.  I submitted the edits anyway.

I recieved an email from Doug Weller, who advised me that the edit was not  made because I did not include a source reference.
Today I responded with the text below.

Hi, Doug,

You wrote

“Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Norumbega did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed”

I am an old man, 85 years, with poor eye sight, and Parkinson driven fingers.  Those are not excuses, but valid reasons why I gave up trying to insert my reference. I planned to return today.

My reference was 

In the right hand column, you should be able to read that the “High and Mighty Prince Charles” did replace “Norumbega” with “New England” in 1616.

The previous Wikipedia author did NOT reference evidence that Norumbega was “Legendary” or a “somewhat mythical name.”  In fact the name Norumbrega is on the map in two places and as valid as any other name.

Another name on the map is “COR TEREALIS” which is authentic because Wikipedia has a reference to “Gaspar Corte-Real.”  (Corte-Real and Columbus were Portuguese observers in boats rowed by Norwegians.  The English in 1616, who were planning to conquer America, did not want anybody to know that Norse were in America.  Thus they called the “Norumbega” map a map of a Mythical Island.”)

By continuing the MYTH, WIkipedia continues the suppressing of factual history.

Wikipedia has a LONG TERM PROBLEM.

The 17th century English created a MYTH by suppressing all knowledge of Norse in America, like they did the 1616 map of John Smith.

We, all, learned the English MYTH.  Nearly everyone in the world believes the MYTH.
So, Wikipedia authors do NOT have to provide evidence of statements of “somewhat Mythical.”

Those, who believe the MYTH, will defend the MYTH by taking actions such as deleting valid edits instead of waiting for references not yet submitted.

The REAL issue is:

Was Old Norse really the origin of the Algonquin Indian Language as the 15,000 comparisons that Reider T. Sherwin made in the eight Volumes of the VIKING and the Red Man?

If YES, then most Wikipedia authors are defending the 17th century English MYTH.
They are suppressing knowledge that the Americans were speaking Norse when the English invaded.