Popular Posts

8.1.19

WIKIPEDIA NORIMBEGA


Norse vs NO Norse

Yesterday I edited the Wikipedia, NORUMBEGA. but I could not figure out how to add my source reference.  I submitted the edits anyway.

I recieved an email from Doug Weller, who advised me that the edit was not  made because I did not include a source reference.
Today I responded with the text below.
_______________

Hi, Doug,

You wrote

“Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Norumbega did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed”

I am an old man, 85 years, with poor eye sight, and Parkinson driven fingers.  Those are not excuses, but valid reasons why I gave up trying to insert my reference. I planned to return today.

My reference was 


In the right hand column, you should be able to read that the “High and Mighty Prince Charles” did replace “Norumbega” with “New England” in 1616.

The previous Wikipedia author did NOT reference evidence that Norumbega was “Legendary” or a “somewhat mythical name.”  In fact the name Norumbrega is on the map in two places and as valid as any other name.

Another name on the map is “COR TEREALIS” which is authentic because Wikipedia has a reference to “Gaspar Corte-Real.”  (Corte-Real and Columbus were Portuguese observers in boats rowed by Norwegians.  The English in 1616, who were planning to conquer America, did not want anybody to know that Norse were in America.  Thus they called the “Norumbega” map a map of a Mythical Island.”)

By continuing the MYTH, WIkipedia continues the suppressing of factual history.

Wikipedia has a LONG TERM PROBLEM.

The 17th century English created a MYTH by suppressing all knowledge of Norse in America, like they did the 1616 map of John Smith.

We, all, learned the English MYTH.  Nearly everyone in the world believes the MYTH.
So, Wikipedia authors do NOT have to provide evidence of statements of “somewhat Mythical.”

Those, who believe the MYTH, will defend the MYTH by taking actions such as deleting valid edits instead of waiting for references not yet submitted.

The REAL issue is:

Was Old Norse really the origin of the Algonquin Indian Language as the 15,000 comparisons that Reider T. Sherwin made in the eight Volumes of the VIKING and the Red Man?


If YES, then most Wikipedia authors are defending the 17th century English MYTH.
They are suppressing knowledge that the Americans were speaking Norse when the English invaded.


MOST AMERICANS SPOKE NORSE.






26.7.18

STANZA 2 & 3, ALWAYS WINTER

TALLY MAKER
MINNIHAHA,
SOUTH DAKOTA
c1371

Tap on
LENAPE MIGRATION
STANZAS 2 & 3,
ALWAYS WINTER
to see pictographs
& read stanzas
.
Tap on
ARTIFACT 3,
The SEA PEOPLE
to see valid artifact
.
Tap on
WORD 2,
MILWAUKEE
for word meaning


.

.

17.7.18

STANZA 1, IN THE BEGINNING

TALLEY MAKER 
Minnehaha,
 South Dakota
c1370
Tap on
LENAPE HISTORY
STANZA 1,
to see pictograph
& read stanza
.
Tap on
ARTIFACT 1,
SHAWNEE SACRED SLAB
.
to see valid artifacts
.
Tap on
WORD 1,
The FIRST WORD
for word meaning

30.4.18

BRONZE AGE TRADE ROUTES

BRONZE AGE TRADE ROUTES
2400 BC to 
LITTLE ICE AGE (cAD 1350)

Three million people from the east side of the Atlantic came to North America in at least 200,000 crew-rowed boats to remove over a billion pounds of copper from the Lake Superio region.